REGIONAL NEEDS Assessment
Pulaski County Regional Solid Waste
Management District
June, 2002
Introduction
Act 752 of
1991, codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 8-6-701 et seq., as amended, established
regional solid waste management districts in Arkansas. Act 752 and PC&E Regulation NO. 22
require them to prepare and update regional needs assessments (“RNA”)
periodically. Act 752 requires the RNA
to include, at a minimum, the following:
(1) An evaluation of the amount of solid waste
generated within the district and the amount of remaining capacity, expressed
in years, at the solid waste disposal facilities within the district that are
permitted under the Arkansas Solid Waste Management Act;
(2) An evaluation of the solid waste collection,
transportation, and disposal needs of all localities within the district; and
(3) An evaluation and balancing of the
environmental, economic, and other relevant factors which would be implicated
by acceptance of solid waste from beyond the boundaries of the district.
Section I: Major Findings of the Regional Needs
Assessment
1. Landfill
Capacity. If current Municipal Solid
Waste, (“MSW”) generation and recovery rates continue, the existing permitted
Class I landfill capacity in Pulaski County ranges from 4.3 to 60 years. (BFI Model
Fill: 4.3 years; Waste Management Two Pine: 8 years; Jacksonville Wastewater:
10 years; City of Little Rock: 60 years.)
In addition, Waste Management was granted a certificate of need on
November 23, 1999 for a lateral expansion within its existing site, which will
provide substantial additional permitted capacity. However, for the next four
years the District anticipates large volumes of MSW from outside Pulaski County
being brought to the Class I landfills located within the County. While the average Class I landfill capacity
far exceeds the five-year minimum threshold set by ADEQ regulations, the
available and permitted Class I landfill space may be depleted prior to the
30-year maximum capacity suggested by ADEQ regulations. The Class IV permitted landfill capacity has
an estimated 28-year site life, exceeding the five year minimum threshold for
landfill capacity.
2. Solid
Waste System Infrastructure. All
households within the District have access to regular weekly curbside pickup of
garbage and yard wastes. Moreover, 43%
of single family households have access to weekly curbside pickup of recyclable
materials and the remaining households have access to conveniently located
recycling drop-off centers.
3. Solid
Waste from Outside the District. The
privately owned Class I landfills routinely respond to bid requests and compete
to accept large volumes of MSW generated by sources outside Pulaski County.
Presently the BFI Model Fill landfill accepts an average of 94,188 tons of MSW
from outside Pulaski County and Waste Management’s Two Pine land fill has
accepted 12,951 tons during 2002 (January 1, 2002 through May 6, 2002) for an
anticipated average annual volume of 38,000+ tons. The environmental impacts of
bringing MSW into the County from other Districts has been closely scrutinized
by the District and a”host fee” of $1 per ton will be recommended to the
District board in 2002 to become effective in 2003. The funds generated from
this fee will be used to monitor this situation and illegal dumping in the
District as well as to encourage recycling.
Section II: The
Regional Solid Waste Needs Assessment Area
District Area.
The Pulaski County Regional Solid Waste Management District consists of
the geographic area within Pulaski County and includes the municipalities of
Alexander, Cammack Village, Jacksonville, Little Rock, Maumelle, North Little
Rock, Sherwood, Wrightsville, and the unincorporated areas of the County. The following table lists for each local
jurisdiction, the department and official responsible for solid waste
management services.
Table #1: Regional
Solid Waste Needs Assessment Area
|
Locality |
Form of
Government |
SWM Dept. |
SWM Official |
Title |
|
Alexander |
Mayor/Council |
Sanitation |
Shirley Johnson |
Mayor |
|
Cammack Village |
Mayor/Council |
Sanitation |
Harry Light |
Mayor |
|
Jacksonville |
Mayor/Council |
Sanitation |
Murice Green |
Public Works Director |
|
Little Rock |
City Manager |
Solid Waste |
Bob Turner |
Public Works Director |
|
Maumelle |
Mayor/Council |
Sanitation |
Robert Cogdell |
Public Works Director |
|
North Little Rock |
Mayor/Council |
Sanitation |
Harold Ford |
Director of Sanitation |
|
Sherwood |
Mayor/Council |
Sanitation |
Denver Gentry |
Public Works Director |
|
Wrightsville |
Mayor/Council |
Sanitation |
Lorraine Smith |
Mayor |
|
Unincorporated Areas |
County Judge/ Quorum Court |
Sanitation |
Sherman Smith |
Public Works Director |
Inter-local Agreements.
There is an inter-local agreement between Pulaski County Regional Solid
Waste Management District and Southwest Central Regional Solid Waste Management
District authorizing the transfer of solid waste between districts. It went
into effect on July 29, 1998 and calls for a transfer of approximately 85,000
tons a year between districts, It is effective until September 30, 2003 which
is the expiration date of the disposal agreement between the Southwest Central
Regional Solid Waste Management District and BFI, the owner and operator of the
Modelfill Landfill at which the MSW is being deposited. There is no automatic
renewal of this agreement stipulated.
Population Projections.
In 1997, Metroplan compiled and analyzed the following population
information and projections for Pulaski County.
Table #2: Pulaski
County Population Information and Projections
|
|
1990 |
1995 |
2000 |
2005 |
2010 |
2015 |
2020 |
2025 |
|
Pulaski
County |
349,660 |
363,088 |
373,631 |
382,220 |
389,809 |
397,428 |
405,079 |
411,811 |
Section III:
Identity and Quantity of Solid Wastes Generated
Solid Waste means any garbage, or refuse, sludge
from a wastewater treatment plan, water supply treatment plant, or air
pollution control facility and other discarded material, including solid,
liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous material resulting from community
activities, but does not include solid or dissolved materials in domestic
sewage, or solid or dissolved materials in irrigation return flows or
industrial discharges that are point sources subject to permit under 33 U.S.C.
1342, or source, special nuclear, or by-product material as defined by the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (68 Stat. 923).
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) includes wastes such as
durable goods, non-durable goods, containers and packaging, food scraps, yard
trimmings, and miscellaneous inorganic wastes from residential, commercial,
institutional, and industrial sources. Examples of waste from these categories
include appliances, automobile tires, newspapers, clothing, boxes, disposal
tableware, office and classroom paper, wood pallets, and cafeteria wastes. MSW does not include wastes from other
sources, such as construction and demolition debris, automobile bodies,
municipal sludge, combustion ash, and industrial process wastes that might also
be disposed in municipal waste landfills or incinerators.[1]
Solid Waste Estimates in Pulaski County. The Pulaski County Solid Waste stream
increased from 666,053 tons to 741,475 tons between 1997 and 2001
Table #3: 2001 Data for Individual Landfills in Pulaski
County
(all data
is in tons)
|
Landfill |
Compacted
|
Uncompacted
|
Total
|
|
Two
Pines |
187,320 |
41,155 |
228,475 |
|
City of
Little Rock |
62,813 |
57,496 |
120,309 |
|
Jacksonville
Waste Water |
- |
1,886 |
1,886 |
|
Model
Fill |
221,994 |
87,478 |
309,472 |
|
TOTALS |
471,127 |
188,015 |
660,142 |
Table #4: Solid Waste
Estimates by Activity, 1997 Through 2001
(all data
shown in tons)
|
Tons Of: |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
|
Landfilled (Compacted) |
395,628 |
432,955 |
449,119 |
423,502 |
471,127 |
|
Landfilled (Not
compacted) |
212,781 |
168,057 |
219,593 |
172,201 |
188,015 |
|
Composted/
Mulched |
42,343 |
46,616 |
45,049 |
33,004 |
70,290** |
|
Recycled
Materials* |
8,955 |
10,445 |
8,259 |
6,994 |
6,143 |
|
Waste Tires |
6,346 |
5,285 |
5,318 |
5,321 |
5,900 |
|
TOTALS |
666,053 |
663,358 |
727,338 |
641,002 |
741,475 |
* Includes newsprint, mixed paper, cans, plastic, glass,
motor oil, cardboard and
household chemicals
**46%increase in compost/mulched material attributed to
2000/2001 ice storm
2001 MSW Analysis by Jurisdiction. The following table indicates 2001 MSW
volumes by jurisdiction and on a per household basis.
Table #5: MSW
Analysis by Jurisdiction
(all data
shown in tons)
|
Locality |
Households |
Volume |
Volume |
Volume |
Volume |
Total |
|
|
Served
(Single Family) |
Landfilled (tons) (Class
I) |
Landfilled (tons) (Class
IV) |
Yard Waste (tons) |
Recyclables (tons) |
Volume (tons) |
|
Alexander |
576 |
475 |
- |
- |
- |
475 |
|
(Per Household) |
|
0.82 |
- |
- |
- |
0.82 |
|
Cammack Village |
408 |
520 |
- |
66 |
23 |
609 |
|
(Per Household) |
|
1.27 |
- |
0.16 |
0.06 |
1.49 |
|
Jacksonville |
7,200 |
6,583 |
1,229 |
9,004 |